Proposition 91
SUPPORT
Transportation Funding. Initiative Constitutional
Amendment and Statute.
Proponent: James Earp, c/o Richard D. Martland (916) 446-6752
Prohibits retention of funds earmarked for the Transportation
Investment Fund in the General Fund for use unrelated to transportation
after 7/1/08. Requires repayment by 6/30/17 of transportation funds
retained in the General Fund in years prior to 2007-08. Eliminates General
Fund borrowing of specified transportation funds, except for cash-flow
purposes (repayment required within 30 days of adoption of budget);
current law allows borrowing for three years where Governor declares
transfer would cause significant negative fiscal impact on governmental
functions and Legislature enacts authorizing statute. Summary of estimate
by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state
and local governments: No revenue or cost effects. Increases stability of
funding to transportation in 2007-08 and thereafter; reduces somewhat the
state’s flexibility to use specified transportation funds for other (nontransportation)
activities. (SA2005RF0123)
(Full Text)
IProposition
92 OPPOSED
Community Colleges. Funding. Governance. Fees.
Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.
Proponents: Dennis Smith and Scott Lay c/o Eugene Hill (916) 442-2952
Establishes in state constitution a system of independent public
community college districts and Board of Governors. Generally, requires
minimum levels of state funding for school districts and community college
districts to be calculated separately, using different criteria and
separately appropriated. Allocates 10.46 percent of current Proposition 98
school funding maintenance factor to community colleges. Sets community
college fees at $15/unit per semester; limits future fee increases.
Provides formula for allocation by Legislature to community college
districts that would not otherwise receive general fund revenues through
community college apportionment. Summary of estimate by Legislative
Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local
governments: Potential increases in state spending on K-14 education of
about $135 million in 2007-08, $275 million in 2008-09, and $470 million
in 2009-2010, with unknown impact annually thereafter. Annual loss of fee
revenues to community colleges of about $71 million in 2007-08, with
unknown impacts annually thereafter. (06-0030.)
(Full Text)
Proposition 93
OPPOSED
Limits on Legislators’ Terms in Office. Initiative
Constitutional Amendment.
Proponents: Robin B. Johansen and Kari Krogseng c/o James C.
Harrison (510) 346-6200
Reduces the total amount of time a person may serve in the state
legislature from 14 years to 12 years. Allows a person to serve a total of
12 years either in the Assembly, the Senate, or a combination of both.
Provides a transition period to allow current members to serve a total of
12 consecutive years in the house in which they are currently serving,
regardless of any prior service in another house. Summary of estimate by
Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and
local governments: This measure would have no direct fiscal effect on
state or local governments. (07-0004.)
(Full Text)
Proposition 94
VOTE YES
Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment
to Indian Gaming Compact.
Proponent: Jack Gribbon
If this petition is signed by the required number of registered
voters and timely filed with the Secretary of State, it will stop
the law (Chapter 40, Statutes of 2007) from going into effect,
unless a majority of voters at the next statewide election vote in
its favor. The challenged law ratifies an amendment to an existing
gaming compact between the state and Pechanga Band of Luiseño
Mission Indians; exempts certain projects from the California
Environmental Quality Act; requires that revenue paid by tribe be
deposited in the General Fund. (07-0037.)
(Full Text)
Proposition 95
VOTE YES
Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment to
Indian Gaming Compact.
Proponent: Jack Gribbon
If this petition is signed by the required number of registered
voters and timely filed with the Secretary of State, it will stop
the law (Chapter 38, Statutes of 2007) from going into effect,
unless a majority of voters at the next statewide election vote in
its favor. The challenged law ratifies an amendment to an existing
gaming compact between the state and Morongo Band of Mission
Indians; exempts certain projects from the California Environmental
Quality Act; requires that revenue paid by the tribe be deposited in
the General Fund. (07-0035.)
(Full Text)
Proposition 96
VOTE YES
Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment to
Indian Gaming Compact.
Proponent: Jack Gribbon
If this petition is signed by the required number of registered
voters and timely filed with the Secretary of State, it will stop
the law (Chapter 39, Statutes of 2007) from going into effect,
unless a majority of voters at the next statewide election vote in
its favor. The challenged law ratifies an amendment to an existing
gaming compact between the state and Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay
Nation; exempts certain projects from the California Environmental
Quality Act; specifies where revenue paid by tribe pursuant to the
amendment is deposited. (07-0036.)
(Full Text)
Proposition 97
VOTE YES
Referendum Petition to Overturn Amendment to
Indian Gaming Compact.
Proponent: Jack Gribbon
If this petition is signed by the required number of registered
voters and timely filed with the Secretary of State, it will stop
the law (Chapter 41, Statutes of 2007) from going into effect,
unless a majority of voters at the next statewide election vote in
its favor. The challenged law ratifies an amendment to an existing
gaming compact between the state and Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians; exempts certain projects from the California Environmental
Quality Act; requires that revenue paid by tribe be deposited in the
General Fund. (07-0038.)
(Full Text)
|
|